Thursday October 27, 2016
| Last update: Wednesday at 8:09 PM

Georgians march against corporate giant Monsanto

by Raymond D. Franklin |
May 16, 2014
Read more articles in

Savannah, GA - About 100 people marched from Johnson Square after a large rally against the Monsanto Corporation, a bio-technical and chemical giant. Monsanto plays a major role in industrialized agriculture. Marchers voiced concern or opposition to Monsanto’s genetically modified crops, unfair labor practices and poor treatment of workers. Today, genetically engineered crops account for 93% of all U.S. soybeans and about 90% of corn.

People demonstrated as part of the wider March Against Monsanto movement, an international campaign. Protesters raised health concerns about consuming genetically modified organisms (GMOs). For example, most of Monsanto's seeds, including soy, corn, alfalfa and cotton, contain glyphosate resistance - a chemical used to combat weeds while protecting the crops. Scientists are debating the health and safety of GMOs, while Monsanto attempts to stifle discussion.

Frank Bessinger of Veterans for Peace stated, “The chemicals used by Monsanto are dangerous to workers. Many migrant workers die from exposure to Monsanto products.” In contrast, laborers working directly for Monsanto wear biohazard suits to avoid direct exposure to chemicals declared safe by the company. Monsanto also sells the strong chemicals used by the U.S. military for spraying fields in Colombia. U.S. planes spray wide areas to kill all the crops grown by poor farmers in rebel areas of Colombia. Glyphosate burns farmers’ and animals’ skin, leaving rashes and ulcers, and some children reportedly suffer asthma attacks.

Some at the march talked about ending the super-exploitation of the migrant farm worker by Monsanto. In 2012 a group of migrant workers in Texas sued Monsanto over poor labor and housing conditions. The farm workers were paid significantly less than the U.S. federal minimum wage. They were also lived in inadequate housing and were forced to pay for it. Farm workers claim the company promised free accommodations.

According to Daniel Moss, one of the lead organizers of March Against Monsanto and a member of the Revolutionary People's Union of Savannah, said, “The goal of March Against Monsanto is to raise awareness of industrialized food and to encourage people to support their local farmers.”

When asked about public awareness concerning the company’s exploitation of migrant workers, Moss said, “We have not made enough progress...but we have begun to move in that direction. The system that Monsanto is part of can only continue through the exploitation of the migrant worker and because the U.S. government supports it.”

In March of 2013 President Barack Obama signed the Farmer Assurance Provision, often referred to as the “Monsanto Protection Act” because the bill protects Monsanto from litigation. This is the third protest in Savannah against Monsanto and organizers say they will be back again next spring.


Tom Burke wrote 2 years 21 weeks ago

glyphosate "resistance"

The article should have said "glyphosate resistance" instead of "contains glyphosate".

Anonymous wrote 2 years 22 weeks ago

Error in Article

There are no seeds that contain glyphosate. Round Up Ready crops are resistant to glyphosate. They don't contain the chemical, though you state that they do in this article. Please edit or correct your profound error.

bj wrote 2 years 22 weeks ago


1. Roundup wasn't even mentioned in the article; and

2. Glyphosate is an active ingredient to Roundup.

Your_Everyday_Know_It_All wrote 2 years 23 weeks ago

Anti-Monsanto, Pro-GMO

This article is largely much better than most other articles addressing corporate biotech giant Monsanto. Most articles tend to fall back on the assumption that we know transgenic crops are unsafe, which just isn't true. In fact, they're arguably much more safer due to their tight regulations and overall nature of the fact that we now have both direct knowledge and control over the crops' genetic modification.

Irrelevant, however. It's good to see an article make note of what the protesters think about GMOs, but then actually get down to the real business soon thereafter - how Monsanto's policies affect actual workers, both foreign and domestic. Not if 1-3 modified genes per crop will result in a nonsensical depopulation plot.

Moving the discussion away from "Are GMOs safe?" and instead towards "Should GMOs only be controlled by one corporation?" would be the most productive move for leftists today. We need to start emphasizing much less on the sword, and much more on the sword's wielder. Only then will we find solutions to the problem of Monsanto.

So it's okay to be both Anti-Monsanto and Pro-GMO. What is needed is a People's Pro-GMO Movement. One which calls for the open-sourcing of transgenic crop production as a means of countering the weight of power currently largely held by large companies like Monsanto.

As former anti-GMO activist Mark Lynas noted last year:

"We employed a lot of imagery about scientists in their labs cackling demonically as they tinkered with the very building blocks of life. Hence the Frankenstein food tag – this absolutely was about deep-seated fears of scientific powers being used secretly for unnatural ends. What we didn’t realise at the time was that the real Frankenstein’s monster was not GM technology, but our reaction against it."