Saturday May 18, 2013
| Last update: Friday at 3:48 PM

Blackshirts & Bats: Chris Nolan’s far right worldview in The Dark Knight Rises

Review by Dave Schneider |
July 22, 2012
Read more articles in

**Spoiler alert: This review is full of spoilers**

Director Chris Nolan calls it a “revolutionary epic.” I’d call it a counter-revolutionary blockbuster.

First, let’s get the obvious out of the way: The Dark Knight Rises is an outstanding film visually, and it’s scintillating to watch on the big screen. Christopher Nolan did not disappoint in delivering an action-packed superhero tour-de-force like the previous two Batman films. He tied the first two installments together to complete a complex and compelling story. And most impressive of all, in my opinion, series-newcomer Anne Hathaway’s role as Catwoman is one of the best performances of the year.

But when I left The Dark Knight Rises at nearly 3:00 a.m. on its opening night, my opinion of the film was decidedly more mixed than my reaction to The Dark Knight four years ago. Sure, after you cut through Heath Ledger’s incredible performance and the mind-blowing special effects, The Dark Knight was an insidious defense of the Bush administration’s war on terror, interestingly timed right before the 2008 election. However, I didn’t pick up on Nolan’s profoundly reactionary worldview when I saw that second Batman film in the summer between high school and college. This time around – after four years of activism, witnessing the rise of both the Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party movements and seeing the widespread disappointment with President Obama – I couldn’t think of much else.

In The Dark Knight [2008], Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale), part-time CEO and full-time vigilante, faces off against a villain so one-dimensional and disturbing he could have starred on a Dateline NBC crime special. Heath Ledger’s brilliant performance as the Joker overshadowed how closely his character mirrored the classic image of terrorists painted by the Bush administration for eight years (“Some men just want to watch the world burn”), with no discernible reasons or motivations for their actions. To protect us from the Joker, Batman takes it on himself to begin torturing prisoners, wiretapping civilians’ cell phones, and lying to the people of Gotham, all ‘for their protection.’ When Harvey Dent (Aaron Eckhardt), the tough-on-crime district attorney, becomes a madman and starts offing citizens, Batman subdues him and colludes with Commissioner Gordon (Gary Oldman) to take the fall for Dent’s crimes. We are told in the first scene of Nolan’s new film that this lie allowed Gotham to pass the Harvey Dent Act, which reduced crime by simultaneously reducing civil liberties. Sounds like a fair trade, right Mr. Bush?

The Dark Knight Rises starts eight years later. Wayne is older, partially crippled and reclusive, having retired from the outside world after the death of his childhood love, Rachel Dawes (Maggie Gyllenhaal) in the last movie. Bane (Tom Hardy), a muscular insurrectionist clad in a bulletproof vest and a breathing mask lifted from the Predator movies, shows up in Gotham to bring down the city with a nuclear bomb. By the time Bane gets around to breaking Batman’s back and explaining his master plan – trick the people of Gotham into revolution and then exterminate them – one has to think, “Wait, what?”

It didn’t surprise me that Nolan created a film about class warfare, especially given the times we live in. What surprised me was the side he decided to take. The Dark Knight Rises is a film extolling the virtues of the 1% that tries to explain why working people can’t run society and why a fascist police state is actually a good idea.

In The Dark Knight Rises, the rich have it just as bad as, if not worse, than the rest of us. They lose their entire corporate fortunes – inherited, in the case of Bruce Wayne, or stolen from an unnamed West African country in the case of corporate rival Daggert – to terrorist raids on the stock exchange. They have their homes burglarized by the 99%, first by maids and later by angry anonymous mobs. They lose their cleaning staff and butlers, forcing them to (gasp!) open the front door themselves. The power company even turns off their electricity. Forget flying billionaires dressed as bats; this is the most unrealistic part of the movie.

In an early scene featuring Bane taking the entire Gotham Stock Exchange hostage, a CEO stands nervously outside pressuring the police to breach the door and secure the premises. “It’s not just my money,” he complains. “It’s everyone’s money!” A skeptical police officer tells him he keeps his money under a mattress at home, to which the CEO replies – and I paraphrase – If we don’t stop them, your money under that mattress will be worth a lot less.

Here’s a film so blissfully out of touch with the lives of working Americans that it actually tries to make the argument that poor people should be concerned about the fortunes of Wall Street bankers. Nowhere in this film – or any of Nolan’s films, for that matter – is there any attempt to look at the social roots of crime. What about Wayne Enterprises’ bad investment decisions that cost workers their jobs or pensions? Zilch. How about the jobs lost from corporate outsourcing to neo-colonies in West Africa, explicitly referenced by one CEO in the film? Eh, whatever. What about the steady decline of wages that corporations like Bruce Wayne’s have encouraged for the past three decades? Forget about it! Frankly, Nolan should have directed Romney’s campaign commercials. The former governor certainly has the budget for it in the wake of Citizens United!

The Dark Knight Rises is Hollywood’s rebuke of the Occupy Wall Street Movement and the growing discontent with the market system increasingly felt by working Americans. In Nolan’s universe, there’s no difference between protest and terrorism. Ironically, in a world of Obama’s ‘kill list’ and the National Defense Authorization Act, this may be the most realistic aspect of his film.

The masses have no will of their own in Nolan’s series. They are an object to either be manipulated by Bane or saved by Batman. Outlandish scenes of the impoverished masses of Gotham vandalizing mansions and beating up rich people for seemingly no reason reflects the Burkean worldview that informed the founding fathers, the corporate leaders of today and indeed Nolan himself. In the film, the people hold haphazard ‘sentencing tribunals’ with no due process for the wealthy, resulting in sentences of ‘exile’ or ‘death by exile.’ It’s the German Peasant Revolt. It’s the Paris Commune. It’s Occupy Wall Street. It’s every popular movement in history that has ever challenged the will of the ruling class.

Much has been said about the coincidence between the villain’s name, Bane, and the financial management company owned and operated by Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, Bain Capital. In truth, The Dark Knight Rises more closely reflects Romney’s worldview than that of progressives. In a pivotal scene, Bane confesses to an injured Bruce Wayne that he only intends to ‘inspire hope’ to placate the people while he prepares to exterminate them all. By the time Bane cynically talks about ‘hope’ for the third time, I began wondering if Nolan was giving us a window into the worldview of the world’s most obnoxious, Kool-Aid-drinking, Tea Party scrub – a foreign, charismatic leader promises change to the people while secretly conspiring to destroy them all from within. Bane is a terrorist, not a revolutionary, but Nolan never seems to distinguish between the two.

The film couldn’t be any clearer with its worldview. The main villain is a charismatic atheisto-jihadist from a former Soviet Republic. His army of ‘terrorists’ are cement-layers, linemen, bridge operators, service employees; in other words, working-class people. His reserve troops are freed prison inmates, many who undoubtedly were only serving sentences because of the Big Brother-provisions of the Harvey Dent Act. His shock troops are the unwashed masses of Gotham, who are too busy engaging in wanton acts of anarchic violence and vandalism to realize that they were duped by Bane. By the time la revolucion starts up in the film’s third act, it’s impossible to distinguish between Bane’s League of Shadows cadre, the prisoners they freed from Gotham’s prison and ordinary working people in Gotham caught up in the uprising.

On the other hand, we have a slate of heroes straight out of a Glenn Beck novel: an eccentric billionaire recluse who becomes a vigilante to save the wayward people of Gotham from themselves; a police commissioner who lies to the people to preserve ‘order’; a petty cat-burglar who only becomes a hero by renouncing class warfare and hooking up with the lead male; and an incorruptible rookie cop whose Boy Scout-demeanor would make Captain America blush. Bane may have a mob army, but Batman has an army of cops, who march into battle to put down the malevolent…people of Gotham?

In the same year of Trayvon Martin’s shooting by a self-appointed vigilante, the ensuing police cover-up and countless instances of police brutality taking place every day, The Dark Knight Rises’ glorification of police militarism seems bizarre, if not sinister. Similarly, Nolan’s final Batman film and its condemnation of mass political action comes amidst mass uprisings across the Arab world, Europe, Latin America, Africa and even the United States. Maybe Nolan had an agenda, or maybe he didn’t. The point is that a film as anticipated and publicized as The Dark Knight Rises pushes a very particular world view at odds with working Americans and oppressed people.

The message of The Dark Knight Rises is clear: Today’s discontent underclasses are tomorrow’s insurgent army, and all it takes is one charismatic leader to dupe the masses into suicide and destruction. The people need to be ruled by a powerful class of benevolent one-percenters. Lying and violating constitutional rights to ‘clean up the streets’ is generally justifiable. And above all else, never let the people take power.

Even as an activist, you can enjoy The Dark Knight Rises as a film. I certainly did. It’s important, though, that any and every activist combats the worldview and message put forward by Nolan, which itself reflects the larger trend of criminalizing dissent and protest in this country. All too often, protesters are portrayed in the media as parasites, criminals, degenerates, or terrorists for raising serious concerns about inequalities and injustices in our society.

I left the film last night satisfied as a movie-goer and more riled up than ever to fight the criminalization of protest and dissent in this country. Nolan’s film made me remember the words of a famous revolutionary: “It is right to rebel.”

Indeed it is.

11 comments

 
Sixrus wrote 40 weeks 2 days ago

reply

The trial scene is more like the tribunals of the French Revolution. There are elements of Atlas Shrugged, the train in the first movie and Daggert in the last. The film shows the falleness of man and sacrifice needed to improve society.

 
Gary wrote 42 weeks 3 days ago

RE: Important Fact

Judging by the depth of thought put into your post, I assume you are about 12 years old so I will not come down too hard on you.

If you are going to correct other peoples spelling and grammar, as you did with the other poster's "Your" and You're" you would be well served to run a spell check of your own. By "realest" I assume you meant "realistic" which would make sense in the context in which you used it. "Realest" isnt a word unless you meant "realist" and that would be how you spell that word, althought it wouldnt make sense the way you used it in your sentence. I understood what you meant, and i wouldnt have pointed it out (I know I make plenty of typo's myself) if you were not such an ass to the other person posting.

I also will take a minute to educate you on how the US government is set up. "Obama's police" as you referred to them, do not exist. The federal government does not have its own police force, unless of course you are referring to the national guard, the military or the FBI, none of which were used to babysit stoners in Zuccotti Park in New York City, where the Occupy Wall Street "event" (I wont use the word "movement" because it isnt one) started. The police force that did respond to that event was the New York City Police Department, which is under the authority of the New York City Mayor, not Obama. I understand that you want to give Obama credit for everything, regardless of whether he deserves it however, please make sense when you attempt to do so. Also the NYC Police kicked OWS out of Zuccotti Park, so i'm not sure why you think they were so "supportive."

Knowing all that now, do you have anything to add that makes sense?

 
Fern wrote 42 weeks 3 days ago

Important Fact:

@ Anonymous who wrote "Your an idiot"

The grammatically correct way to express this thought is the contraction of "you" and "are" with an apostrophe, or "You're" ... as in "YOU'RE an idiot."

Moving on...

Great, thought provoking article. Even if right-wingers can't get the message and talk about confused notions of the left hijacking the democratic party (Obama's police were very supportive of Occupy movements last year, ah this I remember), this article breaks down the movie in the realest way. Good work.

 
Anonymous wrote 42 weeks 3 days ago

Um...

The screenplay for this movie was written two years ago, well before Occupy Wall Street AND the Tea Party. Nolan said the inspiration for the plot was based on A Tale of Two Cities.

 
Gary wrote 42 weeks 4 days ago

RE:Sonar Mapping Point

Dave, I dont know that I necessarilly disagree with the substance of your point. My remarks related to how they relate (or dont relate) to the movie. This installment, as with the previous Dark Knight, were balanced in their message and presented alternative views, in fact that balance was the underlying message in both movies. In The Dark Knight, the film explored the similarities of both characters Batman and The Joker. The theme of this comparison is this, if you go too far left or too far right, you end up in the same place...darkness. This is true in reality, Communism, Facism, and Radical Religious Fundementalism all lead to the same place taken to their extremes, regardless of the intentions that took them there. There is no right or left, because reality isnt linear, its circular and if you go far enough right or left, Hitler meets Charman Mao at the intersection.

A few examples: regarding the sonar device plot point you mentioned, its wasn't just "casually" mentioned by Lucious Fox that it was dangerous, it was a fundemental disagreement so strong Fox quit his job over it. "As long as this machine is at Wayne Enterprises, I wont be." Batman uses the sonar device, but doent put the encryption key within his ability to use, he puts it in Fox's name, and sets a worm in the system to crash it when Fox is done. Also you and the author of this review seem to miss the point of the whole Dark Knight series of comic books and movies......Batman is a vigelante, of course he pushes the envelope, he is not portrayed as a hero, he is a classic anti-hero. It explains clearly both sides without glorifying either. In "Rises" the Bane character, while breaking into the stock exchange is told "there is no money here, there is nothing for you to steal", to which he replies "then why are you people here?", an obvious statement that the rich are ripping of the poor on a daily basis. It also portray's the view as expressed by the wall street executive "its everyone's money, if Bane is allowed to do this the money in your mattress will be worthless' (im paraphrasing I dont remember the exact dialog). The point is it presents both viewpoints without making judgement. The Catwoman character, said it an early scene "theres a storm coming, you rich people will regret living so large while leaving so little for the rest of us." (again paraphrasing). Catwoman never "turns her back on the class warfare angle" as the author of the review states, she makes a choice based on self preservation. When Bane's intentions are revealed to her she say's "maybe I want it that way" only when Batman explains the Bane is going to set the bomb off anyway, does she help him. She was portrayed true to the classic character as sociopathic and often switching sides when she percieves they further her own interests. Again, it tells both sides without pushing one or the other.

The bottom line is that the author of this article isnt upset that the movie aspouses a far right point of view, he is upset that any view that doesnt echo is own, was not stripped out leaving only a far left viewpoint. He doesnt want balance he wants to push an agenda, to the extent that a comic book movie is the proper place to push an agenda. For sake of the length of this post, I didn't go into many other ridicuous biased statements he made that are just plain false, although i could debate him almost point by point and he will come off as foolish as i'm sure he is in real life.

 
Anonymous wrote 42 weeks 4 days ago

Your an idiot

How ridiculous for u to come up with all this from batman! Obama and the liberals really have brainwashed u! U should go stand in some park somewhere with a 99% sign and become a loser like the rest of the OWS crowd and pat yourself on the back as if you are doing something good for society while the rest of us work hard and make America great! You are an idiot!

 
Dave wrote 42 weeks 5 days ago

Sonar Mapping Point

The only point I want to respond to is the idea that because Batman and Lucius Fox, Morgan Freeman's character, expressed some concern about the potential abuses of the sonar cell phone surveillance device, that somehow makes The Dark Knight (2008) less of a justification for the Bush Administration's policies. In fact, the Bush Administration regularly acknowledged and denied those same concerns, claiming that their actions and policies would not result in a 'slippery slope' because they were only used to track 'terrorists'. Their arguments bordered on tautology, but the point is that they wanted people to believe that when the time came, they would do exactly what Fox did at the end of The Dark Knight: destroy the program and not use it after the threat was neutralized.

You'd have to be a great fool to take them at their word. Civil rights leaders were correct to doubt FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover's similar denial of abusing authority, which we now know happened in egregious ways that led to the death of freedom-fighters like Fred Hampton.

Remember that all movies are narratives, not objective fact. The Dark Knight is told from a very particular perspective with very particular prejudices and biases. If the characters in the film are given the authority to illegally wiretap and spy on citizens but only use the authority for 'good', you have to ask yourself, "Who benefits from such a narrative?" Do you actually believe that the people in power are not bent on abusing their authority to wiretap? Don't take a narrative at face-value and adopt all of the assumptions put forward by the director.

 
Anonymous wrote 42 weeks 5 days ago

How dare Bruce Wayne try and

How dare Bruce Wayne try and be a hero.

Doesn't he know that only poor white kids with spider-powers or intergalactic orphans have a right to be heroic!?

 
Caro wrote 42 weeks 5 days ago

Did you even watch the same films?

Good god, your critique of the films' messages are really, really funnily skewed. And I'm a leftie Canadian, I have never been on the "right" if we're going to delineate on arbitrary this-or-that attributes. Read this analysis and take it from a slightly less political view point will ya?

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheDarkKnightRises/comments/wyfmj/spoilers_was_r...

Nolan clearly has defined the 1% as being exceptionally seedy and a big part of Gotham's corruption. I can understand your viewpoint on the cops and military but even then, those cops DIED to save Gotham. They acted as CITIZENS to save a city they loved, not as a military force to put down the 99%. Also, most of the people in Bane's crew are outright professional criminals, not protesters against political and economic injustice. They just want to kill people and cause chaos.

 
Gary wrote 42 weeks 5 days ago

Far right worldview?

Perhaps it only looks far right from the left cliff you are dangling your feet over. I think it annoys you that the class warfare of this election cycle's politics isnt working. Having someone point that out though great art must be excruciating for you. I think you are over-estimating the plots intent and are perhaps borderline paranoid. First, going back to the previous film The Dark Knight, and your comments, about the sonar device used to track The Joker. It was a major plot point that it was a slippery slope and was never used as a moral argument for the Bush Administration's Patriot Act, as you suggest. Quite the opposite, Batman's nature as unwilling to cross the line by destroying it makes your suggestion incoherent. As does the legnth to which Fox (Morgan Freeman) sermonizes about its danger. You are 1000 miles off base with that one, your judgement blinded perhaps by one too many nights sitting in a park protesting, whatever it was you were protesting? (No one seems to know every person had a different reason for being there, one more bizzare than the next). Try not to bring your politics to the job with you.

As far as this film, i didnt notice a resemblance to Occupy Wall Street, perhaps because I see OWS for what it is and do not share your denial, and that is a leaderless, messageless (at least a cohesive one that all participants agree on) excuse to whine and party with no real involvement in the political process or even a request that can be fulfilled, short of "Give me something I havent earned, and dont particularly feel like working for." The henchmen in this film are loyal, have a clear goal and objective (as far as they know) and are willing to work and die for it......they are the anti-OWS. Only in your wildest delsuions do they resemble OWS in any way. If however, you meant that they (the henchmen) were gullible pawns used by those that seek their own power, and that they are disposable to those who use them, and will in the end be sold out for the good of the power elite........that probably is a similarity between this film and today's political left (which has hijacked the Democratic Party) and OWS as well as the ones they claim to stand for. I dont think that was Nolan's intention, I didnt even think about it until I read this article, but that is quite astute of you.

 
Anonymous wrote 42 weeks 5 days ago

It was very odd. The scenes

It was very odd. The scenes where rich people are being drug from their houses and put on trial by the masses freed from Blackgate looked like something Ayn Rand could have come up with.

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.