Monday May 21, 2012
| Last update: Saturday at 9:14 PM

Nuclear disaster in Japan

By Mick Kelly |
March 15, 2011
Read more articles in

As of 4:00 pm, March 15, a major nuclear disaster is underway in Japan. In the wake of Friday’s devastating earthquake, a fire in a cooling pond for spent fuel rods and three major explosions have hit the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, located on the country's east coast. There are widespread reports of elevated radiation levels and many residents have fled the area.

The plant was designed by the U.S. based corporation, General Electric, which also supplied equipment for the complex. The plant design has faced criticism from scientists over the potential for cooling system leaks. General Electric has also played a major role in the production of nuclear weapons.

Over the last two years, there has been a wide scale effort to revive the nuclear power industry in the United States. No new nuclear power plants have been commissioned here since the disaster at Pennsylvanian’s Three Mile Island Nuclear power plant in 1979. Those disasters strengthened an already existing mass movement against nuclear power, effectively putting the industry on the ropes.

The events in Japan call into questions plans by U.S. energy corporations to build new nuclear power plants.

Commenting on the situation, Steff Yorek, a spokesperson for Freedom Road Socialist Organization stated, "We are in solidarity with the people of Japan and our heart goes out to the huge numbers of working people whose lives, already endangered by natural disaster, have been put at additional risk by this man-made disaster."

She continued, "The capitalists who run the developed countries cannot be trusted with something as dangerous as nuclear power. They will always put profits over safety. Nuclear power is an inherently unsafe way to produce electricity. We need to move to safe, and environmentally sound ways of addressing energy needs."

2 comments

 
Rex wrote 1 year 9 weeks ago

Re: So what the hell are we

Tim, that is a common sentiment, but nuclear is only "cleaner" than coal if you neglect the severe environmental impact of mining uranium and plutonium - both non-renewable resources. Furthermore, until we have a permanent and safe way to store spent nuclear fuel, nuclear power shouldn't be considered as an option. I agree that we do have to get away from carbon based fuels, and one thing that could be started immediately is retrofitting older houses and businesses to require less energy, thereby dropping demand for electricity and other resources. Nuclear power, though, is not only environmentally damaging and unsafe, it's not competitive. Most nuclear power plants are not built or put online without massive government support, because there is so much that could go wrong, and because the cost of building the plant, obtaining the fuel, and then storing the spent fuel is so high. Instead of using taxpayer dollars to fund these plants, we should be directing it towards truly green energy production and lowering the amount of energy we require.

 
Tim wrote 1 year 9 weeks ago

So what the hell are we

So what the hell are we supposed to do if we take 30% of our electricity off line? I don't know about you but I don't want a rolling blackout when I'm having a procedure done at the hospital. As far as I'm concerned nuclear power has an exceptional safety record. It's certainly cleaner than coal. If you want to get off carbon based fuels you can't do it without nuclear power. Keep in mind that zero people have been killed by these reactors and tens of thousands have been killed by the earthquake.

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <hr>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.